Search for: "Foster, et al v. Essex Property, Inc.." Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
When a pro se litigant is a law firm earning its income from the private practice of law, there is no reason why that firm should not be entitled to the recovery of attorney’s fees under the offer of judgment rule
2 Nov 2010, 12:23 pm by PaulKostro
KEVIN LIPKA, ET AL., App. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Northern District's 2007 Trademark Case Filings Down 9%
22 Jan 2008, 3:19 am
 Look for a similar trademark post next week.A hat tip to the Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog for its 2007 IP review series that pushed me to start my own review of 2007 IP cases.1:07-cv-0059Concord Brands, ULC et al v. [read post]
Chicago IP Litigation Blog - http://www.chicagoiplitigation.com/